TNZ reports that after conceeding the Presidential election on Tuesday night, John McCain was spotted in the early hours of the morning drowning his sorrows at a local entertainment establishment:
Can a war hero get a table dance?
Popularity: 6% [?]
Awesome. Check out the attempts to raionalize Obama’s victory.
RedState: Obama’s 2008 Victory in PerspectiveIt’s going to happen, and we all know it: after two close elections, some Democrats are going to claim that Obama’s margin of victory over John McCain was a large, overwhelming repudiation of the Republican party, and that it was possibly even a historical turning point of partisan political realignment.
There’s just one problem with that theory: It’s not true.
See the image to the right (and click for the full version): It’s a complicated chart, but it has a lot to say. On it are illustrated the popular vote and electoral vote victory margins of every Presidential election 1900-2008, assuming Obama gets North Carolina and McCain gets Missouri. This also only counts Republicans and Democrats, and third parties are ignored.
Also on the chart are the mean Popular Vote and Electoral Vote margins since World War II, that is, counting the 1948-2008 elections. From that we can see one fact right away: Obama’s victory is below average. We can also look at the tiny bars representing the 2000 and 2004 elections to see that comparing with those races is simply not any kind of standard to use when judging an election.
Eisenhower 1952 and 1956. Johnson 1964. Nixon 1972. Reagan 1980 and 1984. Those elections set the standard for a blowout. Obama? His win doesn’t look like those other Presidents I just listed. He’s just slightly below average, sorry.
So rest at ease, Republicans. Even if this win isn’t a fluke, it’s not a permanent game changer.
Right. And surely the closeness of the past 5 elections don’t show any kind of demographic or other change in America, or any movement in values. Or any refinement in campaigning techniques. Lets dismiss all of that and start comparing to Eisenhower because all things are equal in 2008 America and 1952 America (as Obama has just shown).
BTW this site is also rounding up the names of people who are leaking about Sarah Palin’s foibles to try to blackmail them later, rather than admitting their mistake and acknowledging that she’s a dumb hick … i mean an ignorant hick. Cuz fleecing the alleged reformer GOPers for free clothes for the fam is not something a dumb person would do!
If this is the response of the Party - to court the ignorant and not deal with the issues in their platform - they will be down and out for a while to come.
Popularity: 6% [?]
What a great article - found on Eddie’s page. There are lots of other interesting tidbits but the highlight is here:
Highlights: Newsweek’s Special Election Project | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008 | Newsweek.comNEWSWEEK has also learned that Palin’s shopping spree at high-end department stores was more extensive than previously reported. While publicly supporting Palin, McCain’s top advisers privately fumed at what they regarded as her outrageous profligacy. One senior aide said that Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist. But instead, the vice presidential nominee began buying for herself and her family—clothes and accessories from top stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus. According to two knowledgeable sources, a vast majority of the clothes were bought by a wealthy donor, who was shocked when he got the bill. Palin also used low-level staffers to buy some of the clothes on their credit cards. The McCain campaign found out last week when the aides sought reimbursement. One aide estimated that she spent “tens of thousands” more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as “Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast,” and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books.
you have to take it with a grain of salt, surely, but it’s still fun. I love that some of the clothes were “lost” - yeah - cuz I’ve used that excuse too! hahah. Also fun is this FOX NEWS report about Palin not knowing that Africa was a continent. Are you kidding me? Sure explains the Couric interview … and how Alaskans re-elected Ted Stevens.
Other highlights: McCain aides wanted to tell McCain that it was over before the last debate. Pain ran with the Ayers attack before the campaign approved it. McCain’s campaign was planning but scrapped a soft-on-crime Willie Horton ad as well as a “dancing with a lesbo” ad with footage from Ellen. Obama had to be convinced not to consider Hillary for VP. Hillary was on better terms with McCain than with Obama. And my favorite:
At the GOP convention in St. Paul, Palin was completely unfazed by the boys’ club fraternity she had just joined. One night, Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter went to her hotel room to brief her. After a minute, Palin sailed into the room wearing nothing but a towel, with another on her wet hair. She told them to chat with her laconic husband, Todd. “I’ll be just a minute,” she said.
Oh yeah, daddy! That’s what I call a serious debriefing.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Florida. Ohio. Pennsylvania. And possibly Indiana and North Carolina. Amazing.
Popularity: 6% [?]
saw this on eddie’s page. rachel talked about it last night too
Popularity: 6% [?]
i guess this is your October surprise
Popularity: 6% [?]
Stolen from Sheldon. It’s EXCELLENT.
I especially liked the part about evolution, the trinity/muslim connection, and “speak delusions to power”
Popularity: 6% [?]