DABR Twitter Web Client Mini Blog Yo Mama Jokes Sports Bookmarklets About Us

March 27, 2009

Class Warfare

Filed under: Economics, Finance, Society — Tags: , , — webadmin @ 12:35 am


 

In the wake of the AIG bonus outrage, there’s a lot of crazy talk about how the direction of the country is going towards facism and socialism, some of it even coming from Europe!! But I think still unpublicized is the fact that over the past decade the uber-rich have, with the help of congress and the presidents in charge in this country as well as foreign governments, have been constructing this scheme designed to increase the gap between the upper class and the middle/working class. They did it by financially supporting those who argued for deregulation as well as supporting constructs that weakened the power of the working class (unions, healthcare, OSHA, etc).

For the most part they were succeeding, unfortunately they took it too far by trying to entice everyone else about the Excess Express to the point that people used their houses as credit cards until the house of cards collapsed. And now the post-mortem is ferreting out all these schemes (legal and illegal) and exposing the mindset of some of these people who would fly corporate jets from Dallas to Fort Worth if they could.

Well Dr. Zbigniew Brezinski (Carter’s National Security Advisor and an immigrant from Poland I believe) was on Morning Joe talking about the growing class warfare coming from the recognition of the gap between the wall street types who were lighting piles of cash on fire for fun, and the common people who may have seen their job of 10 or 20 years close down and their towns disappear. Of course this anger has been fanned by the media and congressmen (some who were at ground 0 for some of these schemes) and not surprisingly Jon Stewart!



YouTube – Brzezinski makes Jim Cramer nervous
Appearing on Morning Joe March 26, 2009, Zbigniew Brzezinski calls for the wealthy to give away much of their wealth in the name of “social solidarity.”

It’s an interesting video which speaks to a point that I’ve been wondering would ever come. I’ve actually been wondering about this since the 90’s. Would we ever reach a point where people would just say “fuck it” and try to take back the country. To a certain extent you have a group of demographics in the country who suffer from the same economic problems but have been kept apart by racial/cultural divides that have been exascerbated by poiliticians. I remember when Obama lost to Hillary in West Virginia in the primary, Virginia Democratic senator Jim Webb (and to an extent Jon Murtha in PA) mentioned that there are a lot of commonalities between poor black and poor white communities and that Obama is perhaps the perfect candidate to bridge that gap.

What I wonder is if this financial scandal and the much reported on excesses is a tipping point – where the villain isn’t painted as the welfare recipient in the NINJA loan-provided $500k house in the suburbs or the unproductive union worker bringing down GM and Chrysler, but instead the uber rich AIG worker who has the luxury of turning down 3/4 of a million dollars in salary.

If it is, are we, perhaps, seeing the beginning of a class shift, especially if Obama and his budget can succeed in changing how we look at healthcare. Are the financial regulations that are coming signaling a new era where making things will be more valued than insuring them? Will we see the benefits of having a more educated society where the high paying jobs that are coming don’t have to be filled by immigrants because of a lack of properly educated Americans?

The pessimistic side of me just can’t get past the fact that there will be enough people who are vested in the status quo that all of these measures will be watered down enough to present the image of change, but result in no meaningful change. Especially if these wild cries of socialism continue. I mean, have you listened to talk radio recently? You’d think Stalin were in Cuba with an Armada ready to invade.

Anyways, I hope at least healthcare and education are addressed. I don’t think we’re as good a nation when everyone is dumb and unhealthy. I think we’re paying for a generation of ignoring our problems as a result of greed and chasing excess. Keeping up with the Joneses has become keeping up with the Shahs and Sultans and Princes. And it’s pervaded our very core with home equity loans, wild refinancing, fuel-inefficient monster cars, and decades of chasing the next it-product whether Cabbage Patch dolls, Gucci and Versace accessories, X-boxes, iPhones or pets.com stocks. Or unattainable suburban housing. Or weekly (or even daily) nights out at the Cheesecake Factory or TGI Fridays.

We need badly to address what we’ve neglected for so long: our people, our infrastructure, our class architecture, our values. It’s either that or learn Chinese and prepare for the Beijing invasion. ????.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

March 23, 2009

Wanna Get Depressed Real Quick?



 

Ever feel like you want to jump off a cliff? Then don’t read Matt Taibi’s article in Rolling Stone magazine called The Big Takeover. You’ll want to just get a gun instead. He’s writing about the economic crisis and the bailouts and AIG and such. It’s a long article and it starts out on a real positive note:

It’s over — we’re officially, royally fucked. no empire can survive being rendered a permanent laughingstock, which is what happened as of a few weeks ago, when the buffoons who have been running things in this country finally went one step too far. It happened when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was forced to admit that he was once again going to have to stuff billions of taxpayer dollars into a dying insurance giant called AIG, itself a profound symbol of our national decline — a corporation that got rich insuring the concrete and steel of American industry in the country’s heyday, only to destroy itself chasing phantom fortunes at the Wall Street card tables, like a dissolute nobleman gambling away the family estate in the waning days of the British Empire.

The latest bailout came as AIG admitted to having just posted the largest quarterly loss in American corporate history — some $61.7 billion. In the final three months of last year, the company lost more than $27 million every hour. That’s $465,000 a minute, a yearly income for a median American household every six seconds, roughly $7,750 a second. And all this happened at the end of eight straight years that America devoted to frantically chasing the shadow of a terrorist threat to no avail, eight years spent stopping every citizen at every airport to search every purse, bag, crotch and briefcase for juice boxes and explosive tubes of toothpaste. Yet in the end, our government had no mechanism for searching the balance sheets of companies that held life-or-death power over our society and was unable to spot holes in the national economy the size of Libya (whose entire GDP last year was smaller than AIG’s 2008 losses).

So it’s time to admit it: We’re fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity. And the worst part about it is that we’re still in denial — we still think this is some kind of unfortunate accident, not something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream. When Geithner announced the new $30 billion bailout, the party line was that poor AIG was just a victim of a lot of shitty luck — bad year for business, you know, what with the financial crisis and all. Edward Liddy, the company’s CEO, actually compared it to catching a cold: “The marketplace is a pretty crummy place to be right now,” he said. “When the world catches pneumonia, we get it too.” In a pathetic attempt at name-dropping, he even whined that AIG was being “consumed by the same issues that are driving house prices down and 401K statements down and Warren Buffet’s investment portfolio down.”

Yeah!! USA!! USA!!

He goes into the genesis of the problem and a bunch of the players in the government and especially the banking and insurance world. One such person is Phil Gramm:

Cassano’s outrageous gamble wouldn’t have been possible had he not had the good fortune to take over AIGFP just as Sen. Phil Gramm — a grinning, laissez-faire ideologue from Texas — had finished engineering the most dramatic deregulation of the financial industry since Emperor Hien Tsung invented paper money in 806 A.D. For years, Washington had kept a watchful eye on the nation’s banks. Ever since the Great Depression, commercial banks — those that kept money on deposit for individuals and businesses — had not been allowed to double as investment banks, which raise money by issuing and selling securities. The Glass-Steagall Act, passed during the Depression, also prevented banks of any kind from getting into the insurance business.

But in the late Nineties, a few years before Cassano took over AIGFP, all that changed. The Democrats, tired of getting slaughtered in the fundraising arena by Republicans, decided to throw off their old reliance on unions and interest groups and become more “business-friendly.” Wall Street responded by flooding Washington with money, buying allies in both parties. In the 10-year period beginning in 1998, financial companies spent $1.7 billion on federal campaign contributions and another $3.4 billion on lobbyists. They quickly got what they paid for. In 1999, Gramm co-sponsored a bill that repealed key aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act, smoothing the way for the creation of financial megafirms like Citigroup. The move did away with the built-in protections afforded by smaller banks. In the old days, a local banker knew the people whose loans were on his balance sheet: He wasn’t going to give a million-dollar mortgage to a homeless meth addict, since he would have to keep that loan on his books. But a giant merged bank might write that loan and then sell it off to some fool in China, and who cared?

The very next year, Gramm compounded the problem by writing a sweeping new law called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act that made it impossible to regulate credit swaps as either gambling or securities. Commercial banks — which, thanks to Gramm, were now competing directly with investment banks for customers — were driven to buy credit swaps to loosen capital in search of higher yields. “By ruling that credit-default swaps were not gaming and not a security, the way was cleared for the growth of the market,” said Eric Dinallo, head of the New York State Insurance Department.

Phil Gramm was John McCain’s chief economic advisor – the guy who once famously said that Americans had “become a nation of economic whiners.” It is thought that he was going to become the Treasury Secretary had McCain won. *shudder* Although perhaps this wouldn’t have made much of a difference!

BTW – the Cassano guy referenced there was the head of AIG’s Financial Products division, a guy who was tutored by the junk bond scandal’s architect Michael Milken, is the guy responsible for the unbacked insurance policies (read: bets) that required AIG to seek all these bailouts.

In the biggest joke of all, Cassano’s wheeling and dealing was regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision, an agency that would prove to be defiantly uninterested in keeping watch over his operations. How a behemoth like AIG came to be regulated by the little-known and relatively small OTS is yet another triumph of the deregulatory instinct. Under another law passed in 1999, certain kinds of holding companies could choose the OTS as their regulator, provided they owned one or more thrifts (better known as savings-and-loans). Because the OTS was viewed as more compliant than the Fed or the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies rushed to reclassify themselves as thrifts. In 1999, AIG purchased a thrift in Delaware and managed to get approval for OTS regulation of its entire operation.

Making matters even more hilarious, AIGFP — a London-based subsidiary of an American insurance company — ought to have been regulated by one of Europe’s more stringent regulators, like Britain’s Financial Services Authority. But the OTS managed to convince the Europeans that it had the muscle to regulate these giant companies. By 2007, the EU had conferred legitimacy to OTS supervision of three mammoth firms — GE, AIG and Ameriprise.

That same year, as the subprime crisis was exploding, the Government Accountability Office criticized the OTS, noting a “disparity between the size of the agency and the diverse firms it oversees.” Among other things, the GAO report noted that the entire OTS had only one insurance specialist on staff — and this despite the fact that it was the primary regulator for the world’s largest insurer!

It goes on to describe an almost systematic coupling of government and rich bankers which include the likes of former Treasury Secretary and head of Goldman Sachs Hank Paulson, current Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernake and current Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, and a shadowy network of collaboration which seeks to dissuade oversight of any kind – even by those elected or employed to do so. And the part that’s probably so frightening is that outside of that group, hardly anyone understands just what’s going on.

As complex as all the finances are, the politics aren’t hard to follow. By creating an urgent crisis that can only be solved by those fluent in a language too complex for ordinary people to understand, the Wall Street crowd has turned the vast majority of Americans into non-participants in their own political future. There is a reason it used to be a crime in the Confederate states to teach a slave to read: Literacy is power. In the age of the CDS and CDO, most of us are financial illiterates. By making an already too-complex economy even more complex, Wall Street has used the crisis to effect a historic, revolutionary change in our political system — transforming a democracy into a two-tiered state, one with plugged-in financial bureaucrats above and clueless customers below.

The most galling thing about this financial crisis is that so many Wall Street types think they actually deserve not only their huge bonuses and lavish lifestyles but the awesome political power their own mistakes have left them in possession of. When challenged, they talk about how hard they work, the 90-hour weeks, the stress, the failed marriages, the hemorrhoids and gallstones they all get before they hit 40.

“But wait a minute,” you say to them. “No one ever asked you to stay up all night eight days a week trying to get filthy rich shorting what’s left of the American auto industry or selling $600 billion in toxic, irredeemable mortgages to ex-strippers on work release and Taco Bell clerks. Actually, come to think of it, why are we even giving taxpayer money to you people? Why are we not throwing your ass in jail instead?”

But before you even finish saying that, they’re rolling their eyes, because You Don’t Get It. These people were never about anything except turning money into money, in order to get more money; valueswise they’re on par with crack addicts, or obsessive sexual deviants who burgle homes to steal panties. Yet these are the people in whose hands our entire political future now rests.

Good luck with that, America. And enjoy tax season.

Time to go schedule my appointment with Dr. Kervorkian.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

March 22, 2009

Spitzer Swallows. Then Returns To The Air



 

The sad thing is – this guy was ready made for this kind of crisis. He’s the guy we needed on TV to speak on this while Tim Geithner and Barny Frank trip over their tongues. He’s the one who would tell the financially ignorant congressmen to go take a hike and call out the free-market fondlers for giving guns to the Wall Street chimps. Why’d he have to go get caught? Why’d he not know that his enemies would have exposed any wrongdoing he was doing. Shoulda stayed in your lane. Dumbass.

Spitzer: I failed in a very important way – CNN.com




(CNN) — In his first television interview since being forced from office in a prostitution scandal, former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer talked with CNN about his personal failings, the AIG bailout and President Obama’s handling of the economy.

In a wide-ranging discussion, Spitzer told CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS” that he thinks he still has a duty to speak about issues like million-dollar bonuses to American International Group executives, but that he comments on the issues “with full awareness and heaviness of heart about what I did.”

“I would say to [critics] that I never held myself out as being anything other than human,” he said in the interview, which airs Sunday at 1 p.m. ET. “I have flaws as we all do, arguably. I failed in a very important way in my personal life. And I have paid a price for that.”

The former governor, a Democrat who led New York from January 2007 until he resigned in March 2008, was hired recently by Slate magazine to write a regular online column.

Spitzer, who was New York’s attorney general for eight years, said he is concerned about the economic crisis and other problems the nation is confronting.

“These are issues that I feel deeply about,” he said. “But I am where I am because of my own conduct. And as I say, I make no excuses.”

His first column for Slate criticized the federal government’s bailout programs. One of the companies to receive bailout money ($173 billion) was insurance giant AIG, which scheduled $165 million in bonuses to senior executives.

Spitzer told CNN that executive bonuses may grab headlines, but the insurance company’s payouts on complicated financial instruments deserve closer examination.

Spitzer said that AIG was at the “center of the web” of transactions that have forced a massive bailout of the U.S. financial system, and that the insurer’s woes stem from financial practices he first investigated as New York’s attorney general.

“Back then I said to people, ‘AIG is the center of the web.’ The financial tentacles of this company stretched to every major investment bank,” he said.

AIG’s collapse stemmed largely from its array of exotic financial products such as credit-default swaps, which went sour when the U.S. housing market turned south after 2006.

“Bonus is a real issue. It touches us viscerally,” Spitzer said. But he added, “The real money and the real structural issue is the dynamic between AIG and the counterparties.”

Much of the $170 billion in taxpayer funds AIG has received is going straight to the buyers of its instruments, which amounted to a form of insurance on mortgage-backed bonds.

With the housing market in free fall and foreclosure rates spiking, those bonds have tumbled dramatically. That forced AIG to pay out money it didn’t have to its clients.

“Virtually all” of the $80 billion-plus in the initial AIG bailout went to the company’s counterparties, including nearly $13 billion to investment bank Goldman Sachs alone, Spitzer said.

“Why did that happen? What questions were asked? Why did we need to pay 100 cents on the dollar on those transactions if we had to pay anything?” he asked. “What would have happened to the financial system had it not been paid? These are the questions that should be pursued,” he said.

Spitzer looked at AIG’s financial practices as attorney general, an inquiry that led to the resignation of Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, the insurance giant’s longtime chairman, in 2005. iReport.com: Sound off on AIG

Spitzer commended Obama for the way the he has handled the economic crisis, comparing the situation to putting out 500 fires.

It is a difficult task to institute good policies that will bring back the economy while keeping support of the nation’s citizens, Spitzer said.

“I think one of the largest, most difficult tasks that he has is to control the outrage that is brewing in the public, sympathize with it and garner it, but use it to get good policy, not policy based upon anger,” he said.

Siptzer Swallows. Then Resigns.

ahh the jokes will never get old. Nor will the ponzi schemes.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

March 16, 2009

Foreclosure? What Foreclosure?



 

Got this first link from Rippa about the unlevel forclosure playingfield out there and there are some interesting findings about how the Banking Industry is trying to get their pound of flesh from the dirty foreclosees.

How Banks Are Worsening the Foreclosure Crisis – BusinessWeek

… with 1 million residences having fallen into foreclosure since 2006, and an additional 5.9 million expected over the next four years, the Obama plan—whatever its details—can’t possibly do the job by itself. Lenders and investors will have to acknowledge huge losses and figure out how to keep recession-wracked borrowers making at least some monthly payments.

So far the industry hasn’t shown that kind of foresight. One reason foreclosures are so rampant is that banks and their advocates in Washington have delayed, diluted, and obstructed attempts to address the problem. Industry lobbyists are still at it today, working overtime to whittle down legislation backed by President Obama that would give bankruptcy courts the authority to shrink mortgage debt. Lobbyists say they will fight to restrict the types of loans the bankruptcy proposal covers and new powers granted to judges.

The industry strategy all along has been to buy time and thwart regulation, financial-services lobbyists tell BusinessWeek . “We were like the Dutch boy with his finger in the dike,” says one business advocate who, like several colleagues, insists on anonymity, fearing career damage. Some admit that, in retrospect, their clients, which include Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C), and JPMorgan Chase (JPM), would have been better off had they agreed two years ago to address foreclosures systematically rather than pin their hopes on an unlikely housing rebound.

In public, financial institutions insist they’ve done their best to prevent foreclosures. Most argue that giving bankruptcy courts increased clout, known as cramdown authority, would reward irresponsible borrowers and result in higher borrowing costs. “What we’re trying to do now is target the bill to make it as narrow as possible,” says Scott Talbott, a lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable. On the defensive, the industry nevertheless benefits from one strain of popular opinion that home buyers who took on risky mortgages—even if the industry pushed those loans—don’t deserve to be rescued.

Why would they do something like that rather than risk the long term losses that would result when housing prices drop and once good neighborhoods become ghost towns and even targets for crime and vandalism? According to this DailyKos poster, the answer is simple: AIG

Daily Kos: Credit Default Insurance Fraud – Tainted Assets

I believe every stage of our financial crisis was managed in a way so as to cash in on Credit Default Insurance. Basically, it came down to Credit Default Insurance fraud.

Credit Default Insurance/Swaps(CDS or Swaps)
Credit Default Swaps are insurance against defaults on bundled credit contracts called CDO’s(Collateralized Debt Obligations) which are debts secured by collateral, ie mortgages, muni bonds.

It is my contention that this manufactured financial crisis is in large part a giant case of Credit Default Insurance Fraud. The banks sold the Insurance companies a line claiming to have purchased a Porsche while having a clean driving record, when they actually had a Pinto, with no brakes, bald tires, sugar in the gas tank and a legally blind drunk behind the wheel.

It would explain how/why AIG seems to be the one getting the lion’s share of bailout money and continues to

These banks (who are raking in trillions) profited illegally by –
1. Fraudulently maximizing the loans to obtain a bigger insurance settlement.
2. Mal-engineering the CDO’s to collapse.
3. Failing to disclose the risks in order to obtain the insurance and subsequent payoff.

The banks behaved recklessly under the protection of default insurance and endeavored to incur maximum damage so that they would receive a quicker and complete payout before the insurance company was crushed by the scam.

It’s a good read and gets into how the credit default swaps could have influenced the process in each step along the way. Basically the banks ran the show and were making soooooooooo much money that the supposed self-regulating checks and balances that Bush and McCain and Greenspan and the like to think would keep people honest instead succumb to that greed. Mortgage originators that gave loans to anyone. Credit rating agencies that looked the other way at the horribly optimistic financial outlook in these CDOs. And AIG who similarly did no due diligence when insuring against the failure of those CDOs (and their mortgage collateral).

So now we’re bailing out AIG (even when their employees are getting paid). Because if AIG failed, the banks would fail and the whole system of international capitalism would collapse. Yet the banks don’t seem to want to put in any extra effort to help stave off that possibility. Because they already have a guaranteed revenue stream from their insurance and they figure no one has the balls to let AIG die.

It seems to me that this is the kind of mushroom cloud weapon of mass destruction that Dick Cheney should have been worrying about. Is it not reasonable, then, to ask that we hang some of these bank CEOs like they hung Saddam. At least send them to Gitmo.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

Missing The Point



 

Read 2 good pieces on HuffPo about the Cramer vs Stewart thing from last week. I also watched Cramer’s Friday night show where he made fun of and dismissed the “confrontation” as if Stewart had a problem mostly with his show. Most of the media portrayed it this way, including former CNBC roving reporter Mike Hegadus: Mike Hegedus: Jon, You’re Wrong. It is a Game, and You’re a Player!

Cramer took a verbal pounding, said his “mea culpa,” and spent most of the show looking like someone who had just been caught shop lifting a candy bar. Sorry, it won’t happen again. Stewart rode in on his charger, about the size of an Icelandic horse, poked and prodded and yelled at Cramer and then made sure to tell Jim that the economic crisis that we’re in is not a “….@$#%^%$$##@…game!!!!!!”

He’s right, the economic issues we all face are not a game, but his show is. And they both played it. Cramer and CNBC have never had this much publicity. And while they both come out of it with a slight odor, little is likely to change. There’s nothing like the stink of notoriety. And the same goes for Stewart — how many more folks watched his show because he had Cramer on? How much more polished is his white knight “armour” now that he’s “slain” the evil Booyah? You think that was part of the plan?

The unfortunate piece of this is that Jim Cramer isn’t all of CNBC. Whatever aroma is attached to him will seep now onto the other hard working folks at the network who get up early and stay late to report on the actual financial happenings of the day. The fact that they don’t have the resources available to them to uncover the shenanigans that Stewart keeps harping about is not their fault. It’s a problem faced by all of journalism and something to be discussed at length at some other time.

And Jon Stewart is not a journalist. He’s a civically engaged entertainer, who apparently as frustrated as the rest of us with the economy went looking for someone to hammer. My suggestion Jon is next time find a bigger nail.

It’s like Ari Fleischer defending Bush. News organizations shouldn’t be excused if they don’t have the budgets to gather news. They should get out of the business or relabel themselves as newstainment. Anyone investing any money without the proper information being uncovered by a free press would be doing little more than playing craps in a casino. That’s the point. The parallels to the Iraq war (as identified in the next article) are startling. Lack of information turns our democracy into China. So if those hardworking guys at CNBC were covering things properly and doing their jobs, I’m sure there’d be no odor on Cramer.

Daniel Sinker: “This Song Ain’t About You”: The Media Misses the Real Message of the Stewart/Cramer Interview

Near the end of the interview (which, if somehow you haven’t seen it, is worth watching), Cramer begins to weasel out an explanation to Stewart (the specifics are unimportant, but if you need to know it involved why Cramer utilizes banana cream pies in his financial program) when Stewart interrupts him and says, indignantly, “As Carly Simon would say, ‘This song ain’t about you.’” It was a point largely lost on Cramer, who continued to defend his own show against Stewart’s much larger indictment, but it was also a point lost on the many media outlets that covered this basic cable dustup as actual, honest-to-god news.

You see, Stewart’s real critique wasn’t about Cramer, it was also only marginally about CNBC. Instead, Stewart’s real rage comes from the role the modern media has created for itself: the role of cheerleader instead of watchdog, of favoring surface over depth, of respecting authority instead of questioning it.

It’s the same critique that some have about the New York Times (and the rest of the media) in the leadup to the war in Iraq; the same critique lobbed every time a TV reporter does a stand up in front of the Apple Store before a product release; the same critique leveled every time a sensational murder steals a headline from a corporate crime: is this really the job we want the fourth estate to be doing?

Just take a gander at some of the other leads around the web–surprisingly, Stewart didn’t actually command attention from everywhere:

But none of these stories–Ana Nicole Smith, Michael Jackson tickets, Michelle Obama giving an interview to Good Morning America–pass muster either. None of them address the issues of our time with the fearless tenacity that Stewart brings to his show most nights, and he’s a comedian.

When we can’t compete with a comic in terms of speaking truth to power, then it’s more clear than ever that journalism in the US has lost its way. It comes as no surprise then when, as newspapers crumble around the country, a report like the one released by the Pew Research Center this week says that only 33% of people would miss their local newspaper “a lot.” When you lead with a story about an interview that happened on a comedy show–and it’s the very same story that almost everyone else is leading with as well–what’s to miss?

What’s to miss–the refrain is always repeated–is the investigative reporting that helps to keep our leaders honest, our water clean, our businesses pure. What’s to miss is people asking fearless questions to those that need them asked. What’s to miss is the deep pockets that can fund a reporter to dig and dig and dig until she’s able to uncover some fragile truth. And yes, that stuff is vital to the functioning of a democracy. It also, let’s speak the truth here, doesn’t happen very often.

Traditional news organizations have nothing to lose right now. Why not take a gamble at the one thing they haven’t tried: being fearless. Stewart would probably appreciate the company.

Rachel Maddow talks about the vanishing newspapers and in-depth journalism all the time. I suppose the one group that doesn’t want to talk about it are the media organizations themselves. How else would they be able to justify things like asking Victoria Jackson for her enligntened opinion on politics.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

February 18, 2009

The Crisis Of Credit – Visualized



 

Nice explanation … from Eddo:

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

February 13, 2009

Sign Of The Economic Times

Filed under: Economics, Music — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — webadmin @ 1:06 am


 

Vanilla Ice, MC Hammer Join Forces for One-Night “Hammer Pants and Ice” Show : Rolling Stone : Rock and Roll Daily

Breaking News! MC Hammer and Vanilla Ice are joining forces for a one-night-only joint show. “Hammer Pants and Ice” goes down Friday, February 27, 2009, at 8:00 p.m. at the McKay Events Center in Orem, Utah.

We can’t possibly answer the inevitable “why” question, but here’s how it will all go down: Hammer is bringing 24 dancers and a full choir; Ice is bringing … himself as far as we can tell. It is evidently the pair’s first show together since the early 1990s, when both were whole-scale radio stars.

When Ice, or Robert Matthew Van Winkle, released To the Extreme in 1990, he actually knocked Hammer (we know him as Stanley Kirk Burrell) out of Number One on the charts: MC Hammer’s Please Hammer Don’t Hurt ‘Em, released the same year, was a blockbuster thanks to the hit single “U Can’t Touch This.” Both rappers relied on samples for their biggest tracks: Vanilla Ice’s ubiquitous “Ice, Ice Baby” borrowed from David Bowie and Queen’s “Under Pressure,” while Hammer’s “U Can’t Touch This” was built on Rick James’ “Super Freak.”

The two former chart-toppers share something else too: a harsh critical and cultural backlash that drove them from the spotlight. Both put out follow-up albums in 1991, but dropped out of the spotlight. Hammer turned to the church, and Ice turned to reality television.

So what will happen later this month in Utah? Anyone willing to shell out $29.50 for general admission floor or $35.50 for reserved seating will find out.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

October 6, 2008

Hilarious Video About A Thief



 

and let’s not forget about G. Gordon Liddy, Watergate Criminal and Hitler lover.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

October 5, 2008

Snippets of some good articles



 

FDR’s Lessons for Obama – David Ignatius, Washington Post

WASHINGTON — It may be the end of an economic era on Wall Street, as commentators have noted over the past few weeks. But it is not yet the beginning of a new political era in Washington. In that gap lies the opportunity for Barack Obama to explain to the nation how he proposes to make a new start.

The frantic debate over the $700 billion bailout plan has obscured the reality that a new framework for recovery will have to be built by the next administration. The crisis package is important, but it’s the political equivalent of an overnight loan, a short-term fix to keep the system functioning. The definition of the new era — the post-crash era — hasn’t really begun.

To win, Obama will need to give voters a clearer sense of how he will govern in this new era. He still talks like a lawyer, making debating points and rebutting arguments, but not explaining how he will rebuild a shaken and traumatized country. This “vision thing” will become all the more important in coming weeks, as the economic crunch moves from Wall Street to Main Street and the country begins to feel real pain.

Franklin D. Roosevelt is the obvious model for a new president taking office amid severe economic difficulty. But what are the lessons that FDR teaches?

The Speech John McCain Should Give – Rod Dreher, Dallas Morning News

My friends, I am neither young nor eloquent, handsome nor smooth. But I have lived a long life, much of it in service to America in war and in peace. And I have always stood for straight talk. There has been no time in our nation’s recent history when the American people more needed to hear the plain truth from their leaders. A fundamental reason our country faces economic catastrophe is that we have built our lives around running from truths about the American way of life.

Washington has run from the truth. Wall Street has run from the truth. And if we’re honest with ourselves, all of us have, in one way or another, run from the truth.

We have accepted the lie that we can live exactly as we want to live, with no concern for the consequences. We have taken the blessings of liberty and prosperity and turned them into a curse of debt slavery – bondage that will be visited on our children, and our children’s children, if we don’t change.

Everybody has a theory about how we got into this mess, and it’s usually one that absolves them and their party from blame. My friends, I’m here to tell you that this crisis is the Republicans’ fault. It’s the Democrats’ fault. It’s the fault of every one of us who believed in the fairy tale of a free lunch.

It’s time for all Americans to take responsibility for what we’ve done. It’s time for all Americans to pull together to help our families, our neighbors and our country through hard times.

Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain – Frank Rich, New York Times

We are not a nation of whiners, as Phil Gramm would have it, but the G.O.P. is now the party of whiners. That rebranding became official when Republican House leaders moaned that a routine partisan speech by Nancy Pelosi had turned their members against the bailout bill. As the stock market fell nearly 778 points, Barney Frank taunted his G.O.P. peers with pitch-perfect mockery: “Somebody hurt my feelings, so I will punish the country!”

Talk about the world coming full circle. This is the same Democrat who had been slurred as “Barney Fag” in the mid-1990s by Dick Armey, a House leader of the government-bashing Gingrich revolution that helped lower us into this debacle. Now Frank was ridiculing the House G.O.P. as a bunch of sulking teenage girls. His wisecrack stung — and stuck.

Palin is an antidote to the whiny Republican image that Frank nailed. Alaska’s self-styled embodiment of Joe Sixpack is not a sulker, but a pistol-packing fighter. That’s why she draws the crowds and (as she puts it) “energy” that otherwise elude the angry McCain. But she is still the candidate for vice president, not president. Americans do not vote for vice president.

So how can a desperate G.O.P. save itself? As McCain continues to fade into incoherence and irrelevance, the last hope is that he’ll come up with some new game-changing stunt to match his initial pick of Palin or his ill-fated campaign “suspension.” Until Thursday night, more than a few Republicans were fantasizing that his final Hail Mary pass would be to ditch Palin so she can “spend more time” with her ever-growing family. But the debate reminded Republicans once again that it’s Palin, not McCain, who is their last hope for victory.

You have to wonder how long it will be before they plead with him to think of his health, get out of the way and pull the ultimate stunt of flipping the ticket. Palin, we can be certain, wouldn’t even blink.

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

September 25, 2008

Letterman Kneecaps McCain For Cancelling



 

Holy Frijoles. Dave Letterman was apparently RED HOT about John McCain suspending his campaign to race back to Washington to deal with the “cratering” economy and cancelling his scheduled appearance on the show last night. Dave spent literally THE ENTIRE SHOW just railing on McCain. It was BRU-TAL.

In addition to repeatedly mocking McCain for skipping out on his scheduled appearance Wednesday, Letterman also devoted, fittingly, his nightly top 10 list to the subject of “Questions People Are Asking The McCain Campaign.” Number Five: “Are You Doing All This Just To Get Out Of Going On Letterman?”

Brutal ESPECIALLY after they found out he was indeed not racing back to Washington, but taping an interview with Katie Couric – a fellow CBS employee!!

“In the middle of the taping Dave got word that McCain was, in fact just down the street being interviewed by Katie Couric. Dave even cut over to the live video of the interview, and said, “Hey Senator, can I give you a ride home?”

Earlier in the show, Dave kept saying, “You don’t suspend your campaign. This doesn’t smell right. This isn’t the way a tested hero behaves.” And he joked: “I think someone’s putting something in his metamucil.”

“He can’t run the campaign because the economy is cratering? Fine, put in your second string quarterback, Sarah Palin. Where is she?”

“What are you going to do if you’re elected and things get tough? Suspend being president? We’ve got a guy like that now!”

It was EPIC. Video below

Bookmark and Share Email This Print This PDF This Blog This Facebook Twiit Google Google Yahoo! Buzz Ping StumbleUpon LinkedIn MySpace

Popularity: unranked [?]

Powered by WordPress

Blog Information